How To Write About Characters Who Are Smarter Than YouA friend of mine shot me this article because, as the title suggests, it’s about some of the more difficult and uncommon aspects of fiction writing. It’s a topic we are often discussing over work.
The point the author is attempting to make is that writing hyper-intelligent characters isn’t about exclusivity and confusing your reader with technical jargon. That is, in fact, the
opposite of what any decent writer wants. Writers are communicators and clarifiers as much as they are artists. All art even strives to show someone else a shade of feeling, an angle of light, a perspective of the human condition that is more, that is different, that is resonant. If a writer throws a bunch of data onto a page to make a character seem smart, then they are failing their reader, and their art.
A quote from the article:
Doyle does not portray genius in the say-that-again-in-English way. His moment of genius does not make you think: “Only some crazy egghead would ever think of that!” Doyle makes the reader go: “God, why didn’t I think of that?”
And this is one of the things that I found so rewarding in writing about Alan Turing: that trying to convey his intelligence on screen was a democratizing act. That opening his one-of-a-kind mind up on screen was about letting other people in; not about shutting them out. That genius is conveyed by sharing intelligence, not by hoarding it. We’re all in this smart business together, in a sense.
It's worth a read, and it talks about Doyle and Sherlock and, yes, even Cumberbatch too. So that's fun.